Can One Support the Rights of Incels, Hikikomoris, and Women Simultaneously?

This article explores the complex and nuanced issue of whether an individual can support the rights of the Incel community, hikikomoris, and women simultaneously, despite the societal discrimination they face. While each group has its unique challenges, examining these issues through the lens of human rights and social contract provides valuable insights.

Understanding Incels and Their Rights

Incels, or Incel-discriminated males, do not have their rights denied simply because of their identity. Being a member of a belief system is fundamentally different from being a race, gender, or class, which are categories ascribed at birth. Therefore, the assertion that Incels face discrimination similar to that experienced by women is not accurate. Most of the complaints about social exclusion by Incels stem from their attitudes and behaviors rather than a systemic denial of rights. It is often perceived as a personality issue.

What is critical to acknowledge is that while everyone has rights, these come with responsibilities. Rights are part of a social contract, an unwritten agreement, that binds individuals together within society. Breaking this contract through actions that violate the rights of others can lead to the removal of privileges and protections.

Supporting Human Rights with Cautions

Supporting human rights must be approached critically. Just because someone is human, it does not mean their rights should be extended without consideration. The social contract is underpinned by the principle of mutual respect and honor. When a group advocates for the restriction of personal freedoms, they are, in essence, proposing the cancellation of the very same social contract that grants them their rights.

The problem lies in the fact that such advocacy often includes the infringement of others' rights, particularly women's rights. If an Incel group were to act on their philosophy, they would forfeit their own rights. This is a fair and reasonable outcome as rights are not absolute and exist in a balance with responsibilities.

Respecting the Social Contract

It is crucial to recognize that rights are not granted independently of the social contract. When individuals break this contract by violating the rights of others, it is a breach that jeopardizes everyone's privileges. Stigmatization and incarceration are mechanisms society employs to ensure compliance with the social contract.

For example, if an Incel group were to advocate for women not having the right to their bodies, they would be proposing a radical change that would dismantle the very foundation of the social contract. Such a change would inevitably lead to the devaluation of all rights, including their own.

Conclusion

In conclusion, while support for the rights of Incels, hikikomoris, and women is important, it must be grounded in an understanding of the social contract and the responsibilities that come with those rights. Respecting and honoring the rights of others, including women's rights, is essential to maintaining the social fabric and ensuring that everyone's rights are protected.

Acknowledgment of Other Movements

It is also important to acknowledge the struggles faced by the hikikomori and incel communities. Both groups often face significant challenges in navigating societal norms and expectations. However, it is crucial to recognize that these challenges do not equate to a systematic denial of rights. Addressing these issues requires a nuanced approach that considers individual circumstances and offers support where it is needed.