Introduction

Recent discussions often question the belief that the Political-Kerajaan Indonesia (PKI) would or did forbid or restrict religions in Indonesia. This misconception is frequently propagated as part of the broader narrative of the 'New Order' era. In this article, we’ll delve into the reality behind these claims and offer a more nuanced understanding of PKI’s relationship with religion.

The Influence of PKI

PKI, or the Indonesian Communist Party, has always been influenced by various international ideologies, especially those of the Soviet Union. Figures like Musso, who spent 12 years in exile in the USSR, and Aidit, who attended the Soviet Communist Party Congress, played significant roles in shaping PKI’s beliefs and practices.

While the Soviet Union did not outright ban religion, it heavily persecuted religious leaders and institutions to promote state atheism or gosateizm. During the anti-religious campaigns, the USSR saw tens of thousands of religious leaders being persecuted and jailed. Many religious places were closed, and even those allowed to operate were subjected to heavy taxation. These measures were part of the broader effort to promote atheism and control the population.

The Nature of PKI and Its Approach to Religion

It is important to note that while PKI was influenced by communist ideology, it is often misrepresented to be anti-religion. In reality, PKI members were largely atheist or agnostic. The party did not seek to actively suppress or forbid religious practices in Indonesia; rather, it was seeking to integrate into Indonesian society in a way that maximized its influence.

Aidit, like many communist leaders, toned down some of his party’s aggressive teachings over the years. This moderation was necessary to gain more followers and support. While the party may have advocated for certain policies that could indirectly impact religious practices, it never explicitly called for religious persecution or the banning of religions in Indonesia.

The Role of Propaganda in the New Order Era

The New Order era, which started after the fall of the Soeharto regime in 1965, sought to create a narrative of the past that would justify its own political agenda. This narrative often portrayed PKI as a sinister and dangerous force, designed to overthrow the government and bring about chaos. To achieve this, the New Order needed a scapegoat, much like how the Nazis used the Jewish community to advance their agenda.

The propaganda surrounding PKI did not reflect the true intentions or actions of the party. Instead, it presented a distorted and exaggerated version of events, painting a picture where PKI was seen as an enemy of religion and an existential threat to the state. This misrepresentation served to legitimize the military’s actions and consolidate power under the New Order.

Conclusion

The belief that PKI would or did forbid or restrict religions in Indonesia is a misconception fueled by propaganda. The reality is that PKI was largely atheist and its approach to religion was more complex and nuanced. It is crucial for historians and the general public to discern the truth behind these claims and understand the full context of PKI's influence and actions in Indonesia.

Through a more informed and balanced perspective, we can move past the myths and propaganda to a more accurate understanding of the pivotal role that PKI played in the history of Indonesia.