Introduction

Recent events in Gaza have raised significant concerns about the actions of the Israeli military. The narrative that emerges is often overshadowed by propaganda and misinformation. This article delves into the facts behind Israel’s actions, comparing them to historical and geographical patterns. It aims to provide a clear understanding of the actions of the Israeli military in the Middle East, highlighting their claim of being the 'most moral army' under a critical light.

The Massacre in North Gaza

The claim that Israel massacred more than 100 Palestinians and seekers in North Gaza has been scrutinized and countered by various sources. According to media reports, the number of 'civilians' reported to have been killed is significantly higher. When analyzing these numbers, it is essential to consider the context and the distortion of statistics by certain sides.

Media and Human Rights Reports

When not counting Hamas fighters or civilians dressed in ordinary clothes, the number of civilians reported to have been killed drops to around 100. This number, however, can vary depending on the source and the type of information being reported. The actual toll of those killed in the conflict can be much higher, with some estimates reaching up to 219,000 Israeli civilians over 180 days. These estimates are based on extrapolations and assumptions and should be treated with caution.

Response to Helen Vertannes

Helen Vertannes' response to the above narrative highlights the moral dilemma faced in conflicts where both sides use unethical tactics. She questions why those who defend the rights of both Palestinians and Israelis should remain silent in the face of significant civilian casualties. The IDF's actions against Hamas and the aftermath of the October 7, 2023 incident have brought to light the need for accountability and justice.

Ethical Considerations in Armed Conflict

Questions of morality and justice are at the core of Helen's response. She addresses the ethical considerations involved in targeting civilians, especially women and children. Her challenge to 'scream for the Hamas terrorists' who killed 1200 innocents highlights the complexity of global conflicts and the need for balanced reporting and support.

The Legacy of Israel's Tactics

The Israeli military's actions in Gaza and the Middle East are not isolated incidents but part of a broader pattern. They have been accused of bombing hospitals, killing children, and preventing medical personnel from burials. These actions, if confirmed, are inhuman and against international law. The organization’s claim to be the 'most moral army' is thus highly questionable.

Activities and Tactics

The IDF is not only engaged in combat but also in spreading misinformation and propaganda. They have a network of drones and intelligence units dedicated to this purpose. The propaganda machine, known as Hasbara, is a tool used to shape public perception and influence international opinion. This is a clear violation of the ethical conduct expected of any state.

Global Implications

The actions of the Israeli military extend beyond the borders of the Middle East. They have been accused of assassinations and bombings in other countries in the region, making them the only country to have engaged in such activities almost universally. The theft of organs from Palestinian civilians has also been documented, pointing to a deeply disturbing pattern of behavior.

Political Corruption and Influence

The influence of AIPAC and similar organizations in major countries like the USA, Germany, and the UK are well-documented. These organizations are key players in shaping U.S. public opinion and policy regarding Israel. Their efforts to block or influence human rights investigations are a serious concern, as they can obstruct justice and accountability.

Conclusion

The discourse around Israel’s actions in Gaza and the Middle East is complex and often distorted. It is crucial to seek out and present the facts without bias. The claim of the Israeli military being the 'most moral army' is contradicted by serious allegations of inhuman and unethical behavior. It is high time for a global consensus on the need for accountability and justice in such conflicts.