Libertarian Perspectives on the ACLU: Reflections and Observations

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) has historically been one of the staunchest defenders of the Bill of Rights. While it has played a vital role in advocating for civil liberties, there have also been instances where it has fallen short of its principled ideals. This article delves into the relationship between libertarians and the ACLU, offering insights into both the positive and negative aspects of this dual relationship.

Historical Positive Relationship Between Libertarians and the ACLU

The relationship between libertarians and the ACLU has, for the most part, been positive. Libertarians value the ACLU's commitment to protecting civil liberties, including freedom of speech, association, and due process. Historically, the ACLU has been at the forefront of many significant legal battles, advocating for the rights enshrined in the Bill of Rights. However, as with any organization, there have been periods where the ACLU has strayed from its principles, leading to disappointment among some of its libertarian supporters.

Non-Libertarian Objections to the ACLU's Name and Operations

A common critique among libertarians is the name "American Civil Liberties Union." For many, the term "civil liberties" is no longer synonymous with consistent principled advocacy. Libertarians argue that the ACLU's current operations and priorities have deviated from its original mission. Despite these non-libertarian objections, the name remains significant in terms of its fundraising and brand recognition. As I, as a libertarian, point out, what the members choose to call themselves is not of direct concern to me.

Theunny of the ACLU: A Familiar Pattern

Like any voluntary association, the ACLU has a unique dynamic, making it subject to the same changes as other organizations over time. As the article suggests, the ACLU has experienced a transformation from a principled, focused organization to one that is more professionally managed and integrated into the broader corporate-government-charity complex. This transition is not unique to the ACLU; many organizations find themselves in a similar position as they grow and adapt to changing needs and funding sources.

Many libertarians and others observe that organizations like the ACLU can fall victim to what I term the "TV sitcom past-its-prime syndrome." In these organizations, the initial vision and passion often fade, replaced by a more diluted and bureaucratic approach. The original leaders and activists may leave, replaced by professionals focused on fundraising and public relations rather than direct advocacy.

The Natural Cycle of Organization Evolution

While this transition can be seen as a decline, it's important to view it as a natural and useful cycle. As organizations grow and evolve, they may lose their original missions and purposes. However, this evolution also clears the way for new, vibrant organizations to emerge and take up the mantle of advocacy. Libertarians and others may mourn the loss of the original organization, but they should also recognize the potential for new, energetic alternatives.

For example, the ACLU's shift from a focused, principled organization to a more professionally managed entity can be seen as a necessary phase in its development. However, it also creates an opening for younger, more energetic organizations to step in and continue the important work of protecting civil liberties. This cycle is a reflection of the evolving nature of society and the continuous need for new organizations to emerge and adapt to changing times.

Conclusion

In conclusion, while there are valid criticisms of the current state of the ACLU, it's important to understand that this organization, like many others, is subject to the natural evolution of time. Libertarians and others who value civil liberties should not despair but rather see this as an opportunity to support new organizations that can carry forward the important work of protecting these rights.

Overall, the relationship between libertarians and the ACLU is a complex one, shaped by both positive and negative aspects. As organizations change over time, it's important to remain vigilant and supportive of those that best align with our principles, while also being open to new opportunities for advocacy.