The 2020 U.S. Presidential Election: In-Person Votes and the Debate Over Fairness

This article aims to address the persistent debate surrounding the distribution of in-person votes between President Joe Biden and former President Donald Trump in the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election. It clarifies common misconceptions and highlights key facts that set the record straight.

Fact Check: In-Person Votes and Fairness

Some have argued that the 2020 election was not a fair one, suggesting a 'coup' based on in-person votes. However, these claims are unfounded. All votes, whether cast in-person, by mail, or through early voting, are counted equally according to U.S. law. In 353 counties across 29 states, voter registration surpassed 100, indicating a high level of participation across the country.

The election is not determined by in-person votes alone. A winner is declared based on the total count of the popular vote and the Electoral College vote. This means that the total number of ballots returned, regardless of the method of voting, contribute to the final tally.

Mail-In Ballots and Early Voting

There is a common misconception that more Democrats vote by absentee or mail-in ballots than Republicans. However, this is not always accurate. Both parties extensively use mail-in ballots and early voting. In traditionally 'red' areas, mail-in and early voting tend to favor Republicans, resulting in close races with Republicans often emerging victorious.

Some states have been using mail-in voting for decades and have consistently produced winners from both parties. This historical precedent undermines the argument that mail-in voting is biased in favor of one candidate.

Investigation into Voter Fraud

Former President Donald Trump had accused the election of widespread voter fraud. In response, he hired two separate investigative firms to assess the claims. By the end of 2020, both firms and Trump's campaign managers concluded that there was no significant mass voter fraud, and that Trump had lost the election in a fair and legal manner.

It's important to note that Trump knew, and continues to acknowledge, that he lost the 2020 election. However, he still pushes the narrative of fraud, benefiting financially from his supporters who continue to buy into these lies.

State-Specific Examples

A case in point is Utah, a state where voting can be done by mail or in person. In 2020, Trump won the total vote with a 58% margin, despite only 6 in-person votes. This illustrates that in-person votes do not significantly alter the overall outcome. In-person voting accounted for a very small portion of the total votes cast.

The number of in-person votes is insignificant compared to the total voter turnout. Therefore, focusing solely on in-person votes misses the broader picture and can lead to erroneous conclusions about the fairness of the election.

Conclusion

The 2020 U.S. Presidential Election was a fair and legal process. Claims of a 'coup' and widespread voter fraud are unfounded. The election results were determined based on a comprehensive and transparent count of all votes, irrespective of the method of voting. It is crucial to rely on verifiable facts and evidence when evaluating the integrity of an election.