The Effectiveness of Democratic Strategy in 2020: Adversely Affecting Chances Through Inaction

Many argue that Democrats are pursuing a strategy that will adversely affect their chances of winning in the 2020 election. This strategy has been characterized by inaction and a lack of willingness to work with President Trump, setting them against the one person with the power to challenge him. It is not merely a matter of voter support, nor is it purely about idealistic public service. It is a question of trust and action.

The Need for Action vs. Appeasement

Historically, one of the most effective strategies has been to unite together and fight back against fascism and oppression. Yet, in this case, the strategy is more akin to pedantic toddler tactics, with any sign of actual cooperation deemed insufficient. President Trump's refusal to work with Democrats, and the obstructionist tactics employed by Senate Republicans, have created a legislative stalemate. This is not a Democratic refusal to work with Trump, but rather Trump's refusal to do so in a mature manner.

Aitantidiagnostikos suggests that the Democrats are not setting themselves up for failure by pursuing Trump. Instead, he argues that the Democrats should be waiting for Trump to fail on his own. While it is certainly true that some of Trump's actions have failed spectacularly, the suggestion that Democrats should simply wait and do nothing ignores the broader trend of public dissatisfaction with inaction.

Public Trust and Democratic Disillusionment

Democrats have lost a great deal of respect, not because they pursue Trump, but because they repeatedly fail to take any meaningful action. Many Americans are unhappy with the status quo and are looking for a change in leadership. When Democrats fail to act, it is not just the votes that are lost, but the trust of the public. Moreover, Democrats' reluctance to impeach a president who has committed serious offenses, despite ample evidence, further erodes this trust.

The problem isn't just about competing for votes; it's about winning the trust of the public. The two-party system in the United States is deeply flawed, and both parties are guilty of mud-slinging and rhetoric that lacks substance. This has led to a decline in public trust for both major parties.

Lessons from Leadership

The leadership and actions of individuals matter exponentially. If a leader like President Trump fails to take responsibility and leads through incompetence, then it is the duty of the opposition to push back and offer an alternative. Democrats must take responsibility for their shortcomings and work towards a better future, not merely pander to the ideologies that have led them to their current difficulties.

Conclusion

It is not inherently detrimental for Democrats to pursue Trump, but it is damaging to refuse to act on their principles and the public's expectations for change. The failure to address the clear offenses and incompetence of President Trump not only hurts the Democratic Party's chances in 2020 but also risks permanently alienating a segment of the electorate who are already disillusioned with the political establishment.

The ultimate lesson is that action, transparency, and the pursuit of public trust are essential for any political party looking to regain power and lead effectively. Simply waiting for an opponent to fail is not a strategy for success, but a strategy for losing the hearts and minds of the American public.