Why Do People Engage in Online Arguments and Attacks?

Why do people argue with and/or attack others on the internet if they know it’s never going to get anywhere? The answer lies in the complex interplay of human psychology, societal trends, and the dynamics of online communication.

The Evolution of Voice and Opinion Sharing

Everyone has opinions and experiences that are often unjust, and in today's digital age, sharing these views has become incredibly easy. In the past, voicing opinions required physical meetings, significant influence, and the use of print or public media. However, social media and the internet have revolutionized this process by making it possible to share opinions succinctly on platforms like Twitter or in-depth via blogs and articles.

Earlier, to share one's opinions with society, one needed to write a book, get it published, and sell it, or perhaps secure influence to appear on a TV show or radio. Today, all one needs is access to a computer or mobile device and a social media account. Utilizing hashtags, tagging famous personalities, or even making a slight jab can bring significant attention. This democratization of opinion sharing has led to a sense of entitlement and belief that one's views matter.

The Psychology Behind Online Engagement

The feeling of entitlement often stems from the fact that opinions expressed online can sometimes receive immediate validation or backlash. When someone far away disagrees with a view, it can trigger strong emotional responses such as anger and frustration. This often results in arguments and attacks, which, in reality, serve more as a form of ego satisfaction than a productive discussion. Social media platforms often thrive on such engagement, as it increases user activity and keeps them engaged for longer periods.

The Impact of Online Behavior

Arguments and attacks, while unfortunate, can also be seen as a form of engagement that can bring about positive change. Presenting arguments or engaging in reasoned discussions can enlighten people and potentially change their views. Even those who engage solely to disrupt can sometimes reveal their true nature, making their actions informative for others. By engaging in civil discourse, one can influence not only those directly involved in the conversation but also a wider audience who may be observing the exchange.

The Role of Ego and Change

Change is often organic and grows slowly. Sometimes, arguing online can lead to a multiplicative effect where influencing just a few people can create a wider impact. Engaging in reasoned discussions, even if it seems futile, is not without its benefits. It can be enlightening for the disruptor and instructive for others who witness the conversation. Therefore, it is not accurate to say that such arguments will never lead to anything. The outcome depends on the platform used and the approach taken.

Conclusion

Engaging in online arguments and attacks is a complex phenomenon driven by a mix of psychological, social, and technological factors. While these behaviors can be harmful and counterproductive, they can also serve as catalysts for change and learning. As we navigate the digital landscape, it is important to recognize the value in engaging in reasoned and civil discussions, even if the immediate outcome is uncertain.