Why Royal Biographer Tina Brown Claims Meghan Markle and Prince Harry are 'Markled'

Tina Brown, the renowned royal biographer, has made bold claims about Meghan Markle and Prince Harry calling them 'Markled.' This term refers not only to their actions but also to the impact they have had on the Royal Family. Why has Brown used such a provocative term? Let's delve into the reasons behind these claims.

The Hollywood-Drama Approach

Tina Brown's latest claims are rooted in the entertainment-driven nature of the Royal Family and its public image. There is a deliberate attempt to create chaos, turmoil, and drama to capture public attention and ratings. The strategy seems to revolve around stirring up controversy and maintaining a never-ending narrative of conflict and scandal.

Just like in Hollywood, where the storylines are highly contrived for maximum impact, Tina Brown's claims are designed to create a sense of shock and outrage. This approach is all about engagement and maintaining the public's interest. The goal is to fuel discussions and keep the spotlight on the royal family, no matter the truth or severity of the accusations.

The IPP Phenomenon

The term 'IPP' (Independence, Privilege, and Power) has become synonymous with the actions of Meghan and Harry. They are batting a thousand when it comes to using their royal connections and status for personal gain. The couple has brought legal actions against his father's government, using the taxpayer's money to fund court costs, and demanding accountability and anonymity for themselves.

These moves are a clear indication of their disregard for traditional rules and norms. They sue anyone or any entity standing in their way, showing no respect for the law or the public's goodwill. Their actions have caused anguish not just to the courts but also to the royal family and taxpayers. This makes it clear that they are not just challenging the system but also benefiting from it.

The Markled Rebranding

For Tina Brown, the term 'Markled' signifies a rebranding of how Meghan and Harry have been perceived. By using this term, she highlights that the couple has been using people unfairly, ghosting individuals, and exploiting situations for their own advantage, just like a cattle rancher might use a brand to mark his cattle.

In the context of the royal family, the term 'Markled' is a way to describe a pattern of behavior marked by a lack of consideration for others. The couple seems oblivious to the negative impact of their actions, showing no remorse for the hurt and disruption they have caused. Their actions are designed to leave a lasting mark, regardless of the harm they inflict.

The 'Markled' brand is a reminder of the unaccountability of the couple, who see themselves above the law and conventional norms. They leave a trail of hurt and disruption in their wake, much like a cattle brand that is difficult to remove. While they may win in court due to the lack of applicable laws, their actions speak volumes about their disregard for others and the values they uphold.

Overall, Tina Brown's claims are a reflection of the strategic and often manipulative approach Meghan and Harry have taken in their public persona and legal actions. Their actions have created a narrative of constant drama and an unrelenting quest for attention and success, but at the cost of others' well-being and the public trust that naturally comes with royal duties.

These claims highlight the dynamics between entertainment, power, and accountability in the modern royal family, and how individuals like Tina Brown use their insights to dissect and critique this complex relationship.