The Roots of Conflicts Between Liberals and Conservatives: Beyond Political Affiliation

In today's divisive political climate, the tension between liberals and conservatives often overshadows their shared values and goals. This article explores the root causes of this anger, focusing on how the rhetoric and behavior of some factions within these ideological camps have exacerbated the divide, despite the fact that political affiliation is not a major concern for many people.

Why the Fear of Extremists?

The perpetuation of fear among voters regarding extremist factions on the opposite side is a tactic employed to manipulate public sentiment. Both the progressive left and the neo-conservative right often exaggerate the influence and actions of these smaller groups, using them as a way to justify radical policy changes. They frame themselves as protectors, arguing that their measures are necessary to prevent a descent into chaos or authoritarianism. However, this approach can often alienate the very people they aim to protect and contribute to a more adversarial political atmosphere.

It is crucial to recognize that the traditional Western conservative values are being overshadowed by these extreme narratives. The Republican Party, which traditionally bears the banner of conservatism, has increasingly embraced big government policies, moving away from the small-government principles that the term originally stood for. The militaristic and neo-conservative wing of the political spectrum has adopted a more authoritarian stance, often aligning with globalist interests rather than the traditional conservative ethos.

Traditional Western Conservatism Under Siege

Traditional Western small-government, Christian conservative values are facing an unprecedented challenge. The corruption and hypocrisy of the modern political system have led to a significant erosion of these foundational principles. While the Republican Party ostensibly claims to represent conservatism, its actions often contradict the conservative ideals of limited government and individual liberties. This shift has alienated many Americans who are searching for a return to the core values of self-reliance and limited government intervention.

The Authoritarian Agenda of Modern Liberals

Contrary to popular belief, Modern American Liberals (MALs) are not truly liberals. Instead, they often seek a form of government that aligns more closely with authoritarianism or socialism, reminiscent of fascist regimes. Their agenda includes extensive state control over various aspects of life, from the economy to education. Traditional conservatives argue that such a system is fundamentally opposed to the principles of freedom and individual rights enshrined in core constitutional documents. The core belief among conservatives is that the government is there to protect both the people and the Constitution from those who would infringe upon these fundamental values.

Historical and Modern Allegiances of Conservatives

The history of traditional conservative politics in America provides a stark contrast to the current narrative of conservative ideals. Early conservatives were often associated with resistance to democratic reforms, such as universal male suffrage and the abolition of slavery. They were actively opposed to labor unions, were instrumental in perpetuating racism and xenophobia, and have long denied the scientific validity of evolution. Their resistance to civil rights legislation and efforts to suppress sex education reflect a deep-seated fear of change and a focus on traditional hierarchies and roles.

Today, the conservative movement continues to display a controversial agenda. Some supporters of traditional conservative values now advocate for a theocratic governance, a move that further alienates those seeking a secular and democratic system. This shift represents a significant departure from the conservative principles of limited government and individual liberty. The conservative movement, often seen as the defender of these values, often finds itself at odds with its own ideals, leading to a complex and often contradictory political landscape.

The Contrast: Helping Each Other vs. Survival

A fundamental difference between liberals and conservatives lies in their views on communal support and individual accountability. Liberals believe in the power of collective action and supportive communities, often seeing strength in diversity and unity. The slogan, "Many hands make light work," encapsulates the liberal belief that collaboration and mutual aid are essential for societal progress and well-being.

In contrast, conservatives often emphasize the concept of rugged individualism. They believe that life is inherently challenging, and individuals must rely on their own efforts and resilience to succeed. This approach often downplays the role of government and community support in favor of self-reliance and competition.

Understanding these differing perspectives can help bridge the gap between these two ideological camps. It is essential to recognize that both liberals and conservatives have valid concerns and fears that contribute to their respective worldviews. Constructive dialogue and a willingness to understand the root causes of these conflicts can pave the way for more harmonious and democratic societies.

Keywords: liberals, conservatives, political conflicts