The Schism in Social Activism: OnDestroying Us All

From an outsider's perspective, it seems like the conflict within social activism is becoming more pronounced, and this division could be detrimental to our collective efforts. It's frustrating when social activists, regardless of their stance, get so absorbed in labeling, partisanship, and judging each other's loyalty that they lose sight of their primary mission.

The ongoing debates and divisions within the social activism community are concerning. While pursuing social change is vital, the relentless focus on internal disputes and battles over seemingly trivial issues could be harmful to the greater cause. The core objective should be to address real and pressing issues such as homelessness, human trafficking, and the exploitation of children.

A Call to Unity

Many observers, myself included, feel disheartened by the growing schism within social activism. When activists on both the far right and the far left engage in behavior that is outlandish and ridiculous, it can push moderate voices to the center and even towards more conservative positions. This not only divides the ranks but also erodes the credibility and effectiveness of social activism as a whole.

It is essential to look beyond petty squabbles and identify the common goals that we all share. Whether it's ending homelessness or combating human rights abuses, the principles at stake are universal. Divisiveness only serves to distract from these profound issues and enables the exploitation of the vulnerable by larger systems.

Real Issues Neglected

Moreover, it's disconcerting to see how much attention is given to internal bickering while significant problems continue to be neglected. For instance, the exploitation of children through sites like Pornhub or through grooming on social media remains a grave concern. Despite being under the radar of major tech companies, these issues persist, highlighting a gap in our collective action and responsibility.

Big Tech's prioritization of profit over people's well-being is a stark reminder that just focusing on one's own cause or side can lead to a blind spot. It is the responsibility of all activists to advocate not only for their specific causes but also to ensure that other critical issues do not slip through the cracks.

Conclusion: Common Ground

While the schism between radical and moderate social activists is a complex issue, it is vital to find common ground and unity in our shared goals. By working together, we can create a more effective and compassionate social movement that truly addresses the pressing issues of our time.

Let us put aside petty label games and concentrate on the fundamental principles that unite us. Only by standing together can we hope to achieve the social change we all fervently desire.