Absolute Morality: When Rules Are Broken in the Name of Justification

The concept of absolute morality often remains a cornerstone in religious teachings and philosophical discourses. It is a moral system that is understood to be unchanging and universally applicable. However, the very fabric of morality can sometimes appear inconsistent, with rigid rules occasionally flouted in the name of justification. This article explores instances where moral restrictions are disregarded under certain circumstances, and the societal ramifications that follow.

Beneath the Veil of Honor

The phrase thou shalt not kill is a quintessential rule in many moral codes and religious texts. Yet, this rule seemingly crumbles in times of war, where soldiers who engage in deadly combat become recognized and even celebrated for their actions. Military service often appears as a necessary and unselfish path to protect one's country, leading to the justification of violent acts that would be otherwise considered morally reprehensible.

Shattered Norms and Racial Tensions

In the south of the United States, not long ago, the mere act of a black man and a white woman holding hands could spell danger for the man involved. Such encounters were not just perceived as inappropriate; they could result in violence and even death. The intensity of racial tensions and inequality in society can lead to extreme measures being taken under the guise of saving face or defending honor.

Shifting Standards in Education

Art can sometimes present challenges to established moral standards, especially in the form of controversial street art. Graffiti on walls, particularly those that convey explicit or challenging messages, often serve as a form of artistic expression. Such works can be seen as offensive or morally wrong by some, with tags appearing on 'sh*t house' walls—a term that likely refers to properties with a high concentration of suburban decay or neglect.

Psychological Underpinnings of Justification

It is crucial to explore the psychological reasons behind such justifications. Intergroup conflict and racial tensions can lead to the dehumanization of 'the other,' facilitating violent or oppressive behaviors. Cognitive dissonance may also play a role, where individuals justify their actions to alleviate discomfort with their own morals.

Societal Implications

The disregard of moral codes can have far-reaching consequences. When acceptable norms shift, they can break the trust that holds a society together. Conversely, upholding strict moral codes can build a sense of integrity and fairness.

Conclusion

Morality is a complex and evolving concept, shaped by societal and individual beliefs. While absolute morality posits universal and unchanging principles, in practice, these rules can bend or break under the guise of justification. It is critical for society to engage in thoughtful dialogue about the ethical boundaries we set and the justifications we embrace.

Acknowledgments